[
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-01",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Due process",
   "Judicial data",
   "Lack of action for extradition"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Concludes that the data challenged are not compl iant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data;",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-01.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-02",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Lack of action for extradition",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion",
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "Concludes that the data challenged is compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data subject to the recommendations below;",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-02.pdf",
  "summary": "General country reports, and extradition refusals granted to other people in the same case, do not establish that this applicant's own prosecution is political. The Commission will not assess a country's judicial system at large; it decides on information specific to the case before it."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-03",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Lack of action for extradition",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "Concludes that the data challenged is compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the recommendations below.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-03.pdf",
  "summary": "Proximity to an ousted head of state and the timing of charges after a change of regime were not enough on their own. The Commission also held that issuing a valid Red Notice does not in itself infringe the freedom-of-movement right in Article 13 of the Universal Declaration, which is subject to lawful and proportionate limits."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-04",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Private matter",
   "Unfunded cheques"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Concludes that the data challenged is not compl iant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data;",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-04.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-05",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Due process",
   "Political character",
   "Trial in absentia"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Concludes that the data challenged are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data;",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-05.pdf",
  "summary": "Where several national courts, international bodies and arbitral tribunals had already found the wider prosecution politically motivated, the political elements predominated over the ordinary-crime elements. The Commission treated political context and the fairness of the proceedings as inseparable and deleted the data without reaching the remaining arguments."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-06",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Reexamination"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "REVISION-REFUSED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Concludes that the conditions to re-examine the case have not been met.",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-06.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-07",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Reexamination"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "ACCESS-BLOCKED",
  "operative": "Concludes that the conditions to re-examine the case are met.",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-07.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-08",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Private matter"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Concludes that the data challenged is not compl iant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data;",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-08.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-09",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Ne bis in idem"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Concludes that the data challenged is compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data ----------------",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-09.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-10",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Lack of action for extradition"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "Concludes that the conditions for revision are not met.",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-10.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-11",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Green Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-11.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-12",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Due process",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the update of the Applicant’s file.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-12.pdf",
  "summary": "Acquittal on some of the charges showed the trial court had not accepted the prosecution evidence uncritically. General reports on torture and prison conditions, and press coverage of an unrelated incident, could not establish a violation of Article 2 in this applicant's case."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-13",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Political character",
   "Private matter"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "commercial-and-family-disputes"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-13.pdf",
  "summary": "Conduct that originates in a breach of civil or administrative rules can still be criminal for INTERPOL's purposes. The requesting bureau showed the charges had been brought lawfully and within its jurisdiction, so the Commission could not treat the matter as an essentially private dispute."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-14",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Lack of action for extradition",
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-14.pdf",
  "summary": "The judicial decision underlying the notice was not an arrest warrant within the meaning of Article 83(2)(b)(ii) of the Rules on the Processing of Data. That the earlier Red Notice had itself been used to obtain the later decision added to the doubts, and together with weak evidence of participation and political elements the data were found non-compliant."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-15",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Religious character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Green Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-15.pdf",
  "summary": "A religious dimension to a case is not enough by itself: the applicant must show that religious elements predominate over the ordinary criminal elements. The Green Notice stood because the requesting bureau supplied a proper public-safety assessment supporting the warning."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-16",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Family matter",
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice",
   "Yellow Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged concerning the Applicant and the Children are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be d",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-16.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2017-17",
  "year": 2017,
  "grounds": [
   "Due process"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data subject to updating the Applicant’s file with […].",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2017-17.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-01",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Lack of action for extradition",
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-01.pdf",
  "summary": "The decision relied on was not an arrest warrant within the meaning of Article 83(2)(b)(ii) of the Rules on the Processing of Data, and the first Red Notice had been used in obtaining the later judicial decision. Combined with doubts over the applicant's effective participation and the political elements around the proceedings, the data were found non-compliant."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-02",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "International interest-Seriousness",
   "Trial in absentia",
   "Unfunded cheques"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-02.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-03",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Due process",
   "International interest-Seriousness",
   "Unfunded cheques"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files.",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-03.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-04",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings",
   "Political character",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-04.pdf",
  "summary": "A later judgment of the very court that had issued the arrest warrant, dismissing the prosecution case and criticising the investigation, carried strong weight even though it was under appeal. Read with doubts about an underlying private dispute and the political context, it tipped the balance to deletion."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-05",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Due process",
   "Political character",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the following update of the Applicant’s file: 2.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-05.pdf",
  "summary": "Applying the predominance test, the Commission weighs the nature of the offence, the status of the person and the general context. Membership of an opposition party did not carry the case where the acts were committed in a corporate role and the file showed concrete personal gain."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-06",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "2018 - Decision Excerpt N° 6"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the following update of the Applicant’s file: - the extradi",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-06.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-07",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Access to files",
   "Asylum-Refugee",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Not specified"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-07.pdf",
  "summary": "A journalist was detained abroad on the notice, yet the requesting authorities never lodged an extradition request or explained the omission, and press-freedom bodies and UN reporting had criticised the prosecution. Maintaining the data risked INTERPOL being perceived as facilitating politically motivated activity."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-08",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 2-Torture and mistreatments",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "human-rights"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-08.pdf",
  "summary": "Statements obtained through torture may not be invoked as evidence in criminal proceedings, and the Commission will review whether a case rests on such material even though it does not assess evidence as a trial court would. With strong political elements alongside, retention would have compromised the Organization's neutrality."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-09",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Family matter"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Yellow Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant and the Child are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from IN",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-09.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-10",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Misuse of INTERPOL channels",
   "Political character",
   "Status of the person"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Blue Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-10.pdf",
  "summary": "Even a Blue Notice, which seeks information rather than arrest, requires concrete elements showing the person's own participation. The file did not explain how the applicant had bribed anyone or benefited, and his post had been a political appointment."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-11",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings",
   "Misuse of INTERPOL channels",
   "Status of the person"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Blue Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-11.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-12",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Access to files",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files if the NCB of",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-12.pdf",
  "summary": "A bureau that withholds the material behind a notice must justify the restriction as relevant and proportionate and accept counter-balancing measures such as a redacted summary. Unexplained secrecy that leaves the applicant unable to answer the case breaches his fundamental rights."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-13",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality",
   "Due process",
   "Political character"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-13.pdf",
  "summary": "Under the predominance test the person's own status is only one factor. An applicant who was never a politician still succeeded, because the criminal nature of the offence was doubtful and the general context of the case was political."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-14",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "2018 - Decision Excerpt N°14"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-14.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-15",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 2-Torture and mistreatments",
   "Lack of action for extradition"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "2) Decides, upon revision, that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files.",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-15.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-16",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-16.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-17",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Access to files",
   "Article 2-Right to life"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-17.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2018-18",
  "year": 2018,
  "grounds": [
   "Access to files",
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings",
   "Private matter"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2018-18.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-01",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Unfunded cheques"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-01.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-02",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 2-Right to security in sickness",
   "Lack of action for extradition"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the following update of the Applicant’s file: the informati",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-02.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-03",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Lack of action for extradition",
   "Private matter"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the following update of the Applicant’s file:  any referen",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-03.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-04",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "SLTD (passport)"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant ’s passport […], issued by […] authorities, are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-04.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-05",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 2-Right to security in sickness"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-05.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-06",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 2-Right to life",
   "Ne bis in idem"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files .",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-06.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-07",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality",
   "International interest-Seriousness"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-07.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-08",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "International interest-Seriousness",
   "Lack of action for extradition"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data ---------------- Vitalie Pîrlog Chairman of the Commission Secretariat to the Commission for the Control ",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-08.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-09",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality",
   "Political character",
   "Private matter"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-09.pdf",
  "summary": "Minor discrepancies in the summary of facts or in identity particulars do not breach the data-quality requirement in Article 12 of the Rules on the Processing of Data, where they neither prevent identification nor undermine the coherence of what is necessarily an abridged statement."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2019-10",
  "year": 2019,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 2-Right to movement within a state",
   "Trial in absentia"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2019-10.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-01",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Description of criminal activities",
   "Extradition"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not c ompliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s file",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-01.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-02",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Description of criminal activities",
   "Extradition",
   "Ne bis in idem"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the following update of the Applicant’s file: - the extradi",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-02.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-03",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Description of criminal activities",
   "Transfer of proceedings"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-03.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-04",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Description of criminal activities",
   "Political character",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-04.pdf",
  "summary": "Protective status granted abroad does not by itself trigger INTERPOL's refugee policy. Generalised claims about a country's judicial system or about tensions between states do not show the flagrant human-rights violation Article 2 requires; those arguments belong before the extradition judge."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-05",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Description of criminal activities",
   "Due process",
   "Extradition",
   "Refugee Policy"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-05.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-06",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Purpose of a Green Notice"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Green Notice",
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-06.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-07",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings",
   "Retroactive application of criminal law",
   "continuous offence"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the following update of the Applicant’s file:  the extradi",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-07.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-08",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Validity of an SMV registration"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "SMV (vehicle)"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of data.",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-08.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-09",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Application for revision",
   "Ne bis in idem"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-09.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-10",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Ne bis in idem",
   "Transfer of proceedings"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Diffusion"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED-WITH-UPDATE",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to the following updates of the Applicant’s file: - the follow",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-10.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2023-11",
  "year": 2023,
  "grounds": [
   "Cooperation of NCBs",
   "Lawfulness-Validity of proceedings"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "procedural-defects",
  "doctrines": [
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2023-11.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2024-01",
  "year": 2024,
  "grounds": [
   "Due process",
   "Family matter",
   "International interest-Seriousness",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Blue Notice",
   "Yellow Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2024-01.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2024-02",
  "year": 2024,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 3",
   "Description of criminal activities",
   "Due process",
   "Human rights"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2024-02.pdf",
  "summary": "The description of criminal activities must identify the person's specific role, acts, timing, means and any benefit. When the requesting bureau left the Commission's questions on those points unanswered despite extended deadlines, Article 83 of the Rules on the Processing of Data was not satisfied."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2024-03",
  "year": 2024,
  "grounds": [
   "Article 3",
   "Misuse of Interpol_s channels"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "SLTD (passport)"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "political-persecution",
  "doctrines": [
   "political-persecution"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2024-03.pdf",
  "summary": "An allegation that INTERPOL's channels are being misused politically must rest on case-specific evidence. General reports about a country's use of the stolen documents database did not displace the bureau's showing that the passport had been cancelled by court order under national law."
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2024-04",
  "year": 2024,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "SMV (vehicle)"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2024-04.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2024-05",
  "year": 2024,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality",
   "Article 2",
   "Family matter",
   "Seriousness"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights",
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2024-05.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2025-01",
  "year": 2025,
  "grounds": [
   "Family matter",
   "International interest-Seriousness",
   "Ne bis in idem",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice",
   "Yellow Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "[xxx] Decides that the data concerning the Applicant s are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files .",
  "primary": "commercial-and-family-disputes",
  "doctrines": [
   "commercial-and-family-disputes",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2025-01.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2025-02",
  "year": 2025,
  "grounds": [
   "Description of criminal activities",
   "Due process",
   "Lawfulness or Validity of the proceedings"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Red Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "DELETED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data concerning the Applicant are not compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, and that they shall be deleted from INTERPOL’s files",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness",
   "procedural-defects"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2025-02.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2025-03",
  "year": 2025,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality",
   "Purpose"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Green Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the challenged data are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data, subject to: a) the confirmation from the NCB of [Country 1] that the r",
  "primary": "data-quality-and-seriousness",
  "doctrines": [
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2025-03.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 },
 {
  "ref": "ccf-2025-04",
  "year": 2025,
  "grounds": [
   "Accuracy-Quality",
   "Article 2"
  ],
  "notice_types": [
   "Blue Notice"
  ],
  "outcome": "MAINTAINED",
  "operative": "FOR THESE REASONS, THE COMMISSION Decides that the data challenged are compliant with INTERPOL’s rules applicable to the processing of personal data.",
  "primary": "human-rights",
  "doctrines": [
   "human-rights",
   "data-quality-and-seriousness"
  ],
  "pdf": "ccf-2025-04.pdf",
  "summary": ""
 }
]